Cultural adaptation and clinical validation of Rapid Cognitive Screening Test in Turkish.

BACKGROUND: The Rapid Cognitive Screen (RCS) is a brief, easy to administer score screening tool for cognitive dysfunction which can be very useful for cognitive screening in busy clinical settings. We aimed to cross-culturally adapt and validate RCS in Turkish. METHODS: A total of 172 community-dwelling older participants from geriatric and neurology clinics, aged 60 and older were included. The translation and cultural adaptation process was carried out in five stages: (i) two initial translations from English to Turkish; (ii) combination of these two translations; (iii) backward translations; (iv) an expert committee that consisted of three geriatricians and two neurologists, one Turkish lecturer reviewed to compare backward translations with the English test; and (v) pretest. The inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability were performed. To diagnose each type of dementia, gold standard diagnostic criteria specifically defined for each dementia were used. Performances of RCS test for dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were analyzed by using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). The receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Among participants, 37.2% were considered as cognitively normal, 25.6% with MCI and 37.2% with dementia. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of RCS (cut-off point of 4) for dementia were 89.06%, 92.56%, 87.7%, and 93.5%, respectively whereas the values were 77.27%, 51.56%, 52.3%, and 76.7% for MCI with a cut-off point of 8. The RCS predicted dementia (AUC = 0.972, 95% CI: 0.935-0.991) and MCI (AUC = 0.720%, 95% CI: 0.626-0.802). CONCLUSION: The cross-cultural adaptation was successfully achieved. The Turkish-RCS was found to be a reliable and valid test for screening of cognitive dysfunction.

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Turkey: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to estimate the prevalence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy in Turkey, which can aid future health policies and strategies. A comprehensive search was conducted on various databases using keywords related to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Turkey. Quality assessment was performed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for prevalence studies. Data extraction was conducted. The random effect model (DerSimonian and Laird method) was used in pooled prevalence data analysis (95% confidence interval [CI]). A total of 1,072 articles were identified. After removing duplicates and excluding articles, 61 articles remained for bias assessment. Among these, 19 articles with low risk of bias were included in the review and meta-analysis. Total population included in the analysis was 15,164, vaccine hesitancy was 30.5% (95% Cl: 24.3-36.8%). Prevalence of the vaccine hesitancy was found to be 39.8% (95% Cl: 31.4-48.2%) in studies conducted before the initiation of vaccination, while in studies conducted after the commencement of vaccination, hesitancy was 20.4% (95% Cl: 12.9-28%). We suggest conducting high-quality studies in different populations to understand the level of vaccine hesitancy, as many of the previous studies have mainly focused on healthcare workers and students, and rest were community-based studies, which have generally shown high bias. Also, we suggest that early vaccination can reduce vaccine hesitancy.

Frailty and its associates in community-dwelling older adults.

OBJECTIVE: While the literature contains several studies on the frailty assessed during hospitalization and/or outpatient settings and nursing homes, few studies have assessed frailty in community-dwelling older adults. We investigated the prevalence of frailty and associated factors among older adults in a sample of community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: We included community-dwelling older adults >60 years living in the Fatih District of the Istanbul Province. We conducted the study between November 2014 and May 2015. We collected the data such as age, sex, number of diseases and drugs, functional status, frailty, the presence of geriatric syndromes, common diseases, and quality-of-life assessment. Frailty was evaluated by the FRAIL scale. RESULTS: A total of 204 adults (mean age: 75.4±7.3 years) were included, of whom 30.4% were robust, 42.6% were pre-frail, and 27% were frail. In multivariate analyses, associated factors of frailty were the number of drugs [odds ratio (OR)=1.240, p=0.036], the presence of cognitive impairment (OR=0.300, p=0.016), and falls (OR=1.984, p=0.048). CONCLUSION: The present study established the prevalence of frailty in a large district in the largest metropolis in the country through a valid screening method. Our results suggest that clinicians should consider frailty evaluation in patients with multiple drug usage, cognitive impairment, and falls.

Clinical validation of SARC-F by proxy as a practical tool to evaluate sarcopenia in dependent older adults.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcopenia is a prevalent disorder in older adults with significant adverse outcomes and regular screening is recommended for those at risk. The SARC-F questionnaire is the most commonly recommended screening tool for sarcopenia. However, as a self-reported tool, it cannot be applied to dependent individuals with communication problems. We hypothesized that implementation of the proxy-reported SARC-F (SARC-F by proxy) would be non-inferior in screening sarcopenia when compared with the standard SARC-F. Thus, we aimed to investigate the clinical validity of the SARC-F by proxy in identifying sarcopenia in older adults and to compare its performance with the standard SARC-F. Additionally, we aimed to determine the ideal cut-off of SARC-F by proxy in screening sarcopenia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a validation study including older adults aged ≥60 years without communication problems and their close proxies. The participants were recruited from a geriatric outpatient clinic of a tertiary health center and a nursing home. Standard SARC-F was transformed to SARC-F by proxy and administered to the proxies of older adults, and standard SARC-F was administered to the patients simultaneously in different rooms. We defined sarcopenia as probable and confirmed by the EWGSOP2 consensus report. We performed receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and sensitivity/specificity analyses of SARC-F by proxy for diagnosing sarcopenia and compared its performance with standard SARC-F by the DeLong test. RESULTS: We included 172 older adults (median age: 72; 44.8% female) and 107 proxies in close contact (median age: 55, 63.2% female). The prevalence of probable and confirmed sarcopenia was 18.9% and 12.9%, respectively. For both definitions, area under the curve (AUC) values of SARC-F by proxy and standard SARC-F were moderate and similar [probable sarcopenia: 0.619 and 0.624 (p = 0.9); confirmed sarcopenia 0.613 and 0.645 (p = 0.7), respectively]. The best balance between sensitivity and specificity was achieved with a SARC-F by proxy score of ≥2 for both sarcopenia definitions (sensitivity levels were 74.7% and 77.8%, and specificity levels were 50.0% and 49.6%, for probable and confirmed sarcopenia, respectively). DISCUSSION: SARC-F by proxy showed a similar, non-inferior performance compared to the standard SARC-F in the evaluation of sarcopenia. Our results suggest that it can be used instead of standard SARC-F to screen sarcopenia in older patients with communication problems. Further validation studies in different populations are warranted to support our findings.

Associations of EWGSOP1 and EWGSOP2 probable sarcopenia definitions with mortality: A comparative study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Sarcopenia is a well-defined geriatric syndrome and a major cause of disability and mortality. We investigate the associations of alternative sarcopenia definitions with mortality in community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: Sarcopenia was defined based on the EWGSOP1 and EWGSOP2 probable sarcopenia criteria, with standard handgrip strength (HGS) cut-offs of 30/20 kg for an EWGSOP1 definition and 27/16 kg for an EWGSOP2 definition, or alternatively, population-specific cut-offs of 35/20 kg for a EWGSOP2 definition. The 5-year mortality rate was assessed in the accessible cases. RESULTS: The prevalence of sarcopenia among 204 older adults [53.9% female; aged 74.5 ± 7.0] was 4.9% based on the EWGSOP1 criterion, 23.5% according to the EWGSOP2-suggested standard (British) HGS cut-offs and 50.0% based on the EWGSOP2 population-specific cut-offs. In the 103 accessible patients, the mortality rate was 30.1%. Cox-regression analyses adjusted for parameters determined through univariate analyses [age and sarcopenia definitions (in 3 different models)], showed that the EWGSOP1 definition (HR = 4.26, 95% CI = 1.45-12.42, p = 0.008) and EWGSOP2 probable sarcopenia definition with population-specific cut-offs (HR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.12-5.93, p = 0.03) were associated with a greater mortality risk, while the EWGSOP2 probable sarcopenia definition with standard-cut offs was not (p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to investigate the associations of EWGSOP2-defined probable sarcopenia with mortality based on standard vs. population-specific HGS cut-offs. The results suggest that population-specific cut-offs should be used when available. We suggest that conducted in community-dwelling older adults, our results have implications for most of older adults.

Impact of Health Workers' Choice of COVID-19 Vaccine Booster on Immunization Levels in Istanbul, Turkey.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding short- and medium-term IgG antibody levels after the CoronaVac and BNT162b2 vaccines. This study aimed to investigate the antibody responses of health workers who initially received two doses of CoronaVac one month apart followed by a booster dose of either CoronaVac or BNT162b2, as well as determine whether either vaccine provided superior results. METHODS: This research represents the second phase of a mixed-methods vaccine cohort study and was conducted between July 2021 and February 2022. The participants (n = 117) were interviewed in person and blood samples were collected before and at 1 and 6 months after the booster vaccination. RESULTS: BNT162b2 was found to have greater immunogenic potential than CoronaVac (p < 0.001). Health workers without chronic disease exhibited statistically significant increases in antibody levels after both vaccines (p < 0.001), whereas only BNT162b2 caused a significant increase in antibody levels in participants with chronic disease (p < 0.001). Samples obtained before and at 1 and 6 months after the booster vaccination revealed no age- or sex-based differences in IgG-inducing potential for either vaccine (p > 0.05). Antibody levels were comparable in both vaccine groups before the booster regardless of COVID-19 history (p > 0.05); however, antibody levels were significantly higher after the BNT162b2 booster at 1 month (<0.001) and at 6 months, except among participants who had a positive history of COVID-19 infection (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that even a single booster dose of BNT162b2 after initial vaccination with CoronaVac provides a protective advantage against COVID-19, especially for risk groups such as health workers and those with chronic diseases.

Prevalence and Determinants of Falls in Community-dwelling Older Adults in Türkiye: A Population-based Cross-sectional Study Conducted between 2014-2015.

PURPOSE: Falls are a common public health problem in older adults regarding increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Determining the factors associated with falls is of utmost importance for detecting at risk people. We present here a field study conducted to examine the prevalence of falls and the associated factors among community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: In this population-based cross-sectional study, we included adults aged > 60 years living in the Fatih District of the Istanbul Province between November 2014-May 2015, through a simple random sampling method. We noted age, sex, falls, fear of falling, number of diseases and medications, the presence of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, urinary and fecal incontinence, and chronic pain. Frailty was assessed with the FRAIL questionnaire. Functional capacity was evaluated by Katz's 6-item ADL and Lawton Brody's 8-item IADL scales. The European quality-5 dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire was used for the quality of life assessment. The cognitive status screening was conducted with a Mini-cog test. Depressive mood was evaluated with the Geriatric Depression scale short form (GDS-SF). Malnutrition screening was conducted by the mini-nutritional assessment short form. Handgrip strength (HGS) was measured with a hand dynamometer. Body composition was assessed through a bioimpedance analysis. The 4-meter usual gait speed was recorded. The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People2 (EWSGOP2) criteria was used for the sarcopenia definition. The Romberg and the postural instability tests were evaluated for balance and gait. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median and interquartile range for descriptive statistics, while categorical variables were expressed as the number and percentages. The differences between groups were determined through an independent sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test when required, and Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were applied for categorical variables. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent factors associated with falls among the factors identified as significant in univariate analyses. RESULTS: The prevalence of falls was 28.5% [mean age: 75.4 ± 7.3 (range: 61-101 years), 53.6% female], and a significant association was identified between falls and the number of diseases and medications, diabetes, chronic pain, frailty, ADL, IADL, and EQ-5D scores, dementia, GDS-SF score and level of ambulation in univariate analyses (p = 0.001, 0.030, 0.030, 0.010, 0.004, 0.040, 0.007, 0.003, 0.030 and 0.007, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, positive dementia (OR = 3.66, 95% CI = 1.40-9.53; p = 0.010) and frailty screenings (OR =1.47, 95% CI = 1.05-2.06; p = 0.020) were identified as associates of falls. CONCLUSION: Falls were independently associated with positive dementia and frailty screening. These results will help develop specific and tailored precautions for at-risk groups to prevent the negative outcomes of falls.

Frailty and its associates in community-dwelling older adults

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: While the literature contains several studies on the frailty assessed during hospitalization and/or outpatient settings and nursing homes, few studies have assessed frailty in community-dwelling older adults. We investigated the prevalence of frailty and associated factors among older adults in a sample of community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: We included community-dwelling older adults >60 years living in the Fatih District of the Istanbul Province. We conducted the study between November 2014 and May 2015. We collected the data such as age, sex, number of diseases and drugs, functional status, frailty, the presence of geriatric syndromes, common diseases, and quality-of-life assessment. Frailty was evaluated by the FRAIL scale. RESULTS: A total of 204 adults (mean age: 75.4±7.3 years) were included, of whom 30.4% were robust, 42.6% were pre-frail, and 27% were frail. In multivariate analyses, associated factors of frailty were the number of drugs [odds ratio (OR)=1.240, p=0.036], the presence of cognitive impairment (OR=0.300, p=0.016), and falls (OR=1.984, p=0.048). CONCLUSION: The present study established the prevalence of frailty in a large district in the largest metropolis in the country through a valid screening method. Our results suggest that clinicians should consider frailty evaluation in patients with multiple drug usage, cognitive impairment, and falls.

Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcome measures of PCR-positive and PCR-negative patients diagnosed as COVID-19: Analyses focusing on the older adults.

PURPOSE: While the definitive diagnosis of COVID-19 relies on PCR confirmation of the virus, the sensitivity of this technique is limited. The clinicians had to go on with the clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 in selected cases. We aimed to compare PCR-positive and PCR-negative patients diagnosed as COVID-19 with a specific focus on older adults. METHODS: We studied 601 hospitalized adults. The demographics, co-morbidities, triage clinical, laboratory characteristics, and outcomes were noted. Differences between the PCR (+) and (-) cases were analyzed. An additional specific analysis focusing on older adults (≥65 years) (n = 184) was performed. RESULTS: The PCR confirmation was present in 359 (59.7 %). There was not any difference in terms of age, sex, travel/contact history, hospitalization duration, ICU need, the time between first symptom/hospitalization to ICU need, ICU days, or survival between PCR-positive and negative cases in the total study group and older adults subgroup. The only symptoms that were different in prevalence between PCR-confirmed and unconfirmed cases were fever (73.3 % vs. 64 %, p = 0.02) and fatigue/myalgia (91.1 % vs. 79.3 %, p = 0.001). Bilateral diffuse pneumonia was also more prevalent in PCR-confirmed cases (20 % vs. 13.3 %, p = 0.03). In older adults, the PCR (-) cases had more prevalent dyspnea (72.2 % vs. 51.4 %, p = 0.004), less prevalent fatigue/myalgia (70.9 % vs. 88.6 %, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The PCR (+) and (-) cases displayed very similar disease phenotypes, courses, and outcomes with few differences between each other. The presence of some worse laboratory findings may indicate a worse immune protective response in PCR (-) cases.

Symptomatology and imaging findings in early post-Covid period: A comparative study in older vs younger patients.

BACKGROUND: While there are substantial reports on the acute phase of Covid-19, the data on post-Covid phase are limited. AIM: To report the data on older post-Covid patients comparatively with the young adults. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center study in post-Covid outpatient clinic. Clinical characteristics, laboratory examination, chest imagings were examined. RESULTS: 665 patients were included (median age, 46; 53 %, male; 10.5 %, aged ≥65). We assessed patients at 47th day (median) after recovery. 43.6 % were suffering from one or more ongoing symptomatology. The prevalence of symptoms or physical examination findings were not different between older and younger groups. Most prevalent ongoing symptom was dyspnea (14.3 % and 11.8 % older and younger group, respectively). Most common laboratory abnormality was high pro-BNP (12.2 %, in both age groups). Despite there was no differences regarding imaging findings at acute-phase, there were higher rates of control imaging abnormalities in older subgroup (35.7 % vs 19.4 %; p = 0.006). On admission 28.4 % younger patients had normal imaging, of whom 12.4 % developed some form of sequela; however, in older group, 40.0 % had normal imaging, of whom 25.0 % developed sequela. CONCLUSION: Complaints related to Covid-19 persisted in about half of the patients at about 1.5 months after Covid. More than 1/3 older post-Covid patients displayed pulmonary sequela in the post-acute period which was more prevalent than those in younger adults. Hence, compared to the younger counterparts, the clinicians should be alert in follow-up of older adults for subsequent pulmonary sequela, even among those that had normal imaging finding on initial presentation.

Probable sarcopenia: associations with common geriatric syndromes and comorbidities in Turkish geriatric patients from a university hospital.

PURPOSE: EWGSOP2 defines "probable sarcopenia" as the presence of low muscle strength without non-muscle causes. The associations of probable sarcopenia have been studied in few reports to date, and our intention in this study is to identify associations of probable sarcopenia with common geriatric syndromes in a sample of older adults who attended the geriatric outpatient clinic of Istanbul University Hospital. METHODS: The present study was designed as a retrospective cross-sectional study. We performed a comprehensive geriatric assessment to the participants. Univariate analyses were performed to determine relationship of probable sarcopenia with age, sex, common geriatric syndromes, i.e., frailty, falls, polypharmacy, malnutrition, and comorbidities, i.e., diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), depression, osteoporosis, and the variables found to be significant were included in logistic regression analyses. The results are presented as an odds ratio (OR), with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Included in the study were 456 participants with a mean age of 74.6 ± 6.6 years, of which 71.1% were female. Probable sarcopenia was identified in 12.7% (n = 58) of the sample. A multivariate analysis was carried out, the factors associated with probable sarcopenia were identified as male sex (OR 0.269, 95% CI 0.142-0.510), frailty (OR 4.265, 95% CI 2.200-8.267) and chronic kidney disease (OR 3.084, 95% CI 1.105-8.608). CONCLUSION: Probable sarcopenia was more significantly associated with frailty than with other geriatric syndromes, signifying its importance as a marker for frailty. The study further identified chronic renal failure as a factor significantly associated with probable sarcopenia among the variety of studied diseases that frequently accompany aging.

Older cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a systematic review for the role of sarcopenia in treatment outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have evaluated the prognostic effects of sarcopenia in cancer patients receiving various treatments, including chemotherapy and surgery, but few studies have focused on radiotherapy (RT). AIMS: We aimed to investigate the prevalence of sarcopenia and the relationship between sarcopenia and outcomes in older cancer patients who underwent RT without chemotherapy. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in Pubmed/Medline and Cochrane databases in September 2021. We used the search terms and medical subject heading terms "sarcopenia," "low muscle mass (LMM)," "low muscle strength," "LMM and low muscle strength," "LMM and low muscle strength and low physical performance," and "RT." Outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, non-cancer death, cancer death, disease-specific survival, local failure-free survival, distant failure-free survival, and RT-related toxicities. RESULTS: Among 460 studies, 8 studies were eligible for inclusion. The prevalence of sarcopenia was between 42.8% and 72%. Sarcopenia was not associated with OS or OS at 3 years in seven studies in which it was defined as the presence of LMM, while it was related in one study, in which it was defined as the concomitant presence of LMM and muscle strength/function. DISCUSSION: There was heterogeneity between the studies because there was diversity in their inclusion criteria, definition and assessment methods used for detection of sarcopenia, considered cutoffs for low muscle mass and strength, cross-sectional locations on imaging to assess muscle mass and included covariates. The discrepancy in the results of the studies may also result from the variations in diagnoses, sample sizes, and treatment modalities. The low number of included studies and a small number of patients in each study limited generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia may be a prognostic factor, especially in OS when low muscle strength/function is integrated into its definition. We suggest that clinicians focus on muscle strength/function while considering sarcopenia and its association with cancer and RT-related outcomes.

Is there a relationship between ACTN3 R577X gene polymorphism and sarcopenia?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The alpha-actinin (ACTN) genes are important structural components of the sarcomere. Sarcopenia is a common geriatric syndrome characterized by morbidity and mortality. Our study aimed to examine the relationship between the ACTN3 R577X gene and sarcopenia in community-dwelling Turkish adults. METHODS: We designed a cross-sectional study among the patients aged ≥ 65 years admitted to the geriatric outpatient clinic. We recorded the general characteristics of the patients. We used the Jamar hand dynamometer to evaluate handgrip strength. Body composition was estimated using bioimpedance analysis. Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People2 criteria with population-specific cutoffs. We performed analyses of low muscle mass (LMM) with skeletal muscle mass index adjusted for body mass index [SMMI(BMI)]. We further categorized the SMMI(BMI) cutoffs into tenths. The analyzes were performed according to the 90th percentile SMMI(BMI) cutoffs. Peripheral blood samples were collected to determine the ACTN3 genotypes. RESULTS: 197 participants were included [mean age: 76.3 ± 6.1 years, 151 (76.6%) women]. The proportions of the ACTN3 genotypes were as follows: RX (45.1%) > RR (31%) > XX (23.9%). The significant difference between genotypes was found only for low SMMI(BMI) according to the 90th percentile (p = 0.025). In multivariate analysis, only gender (female) was independently associated with LMM. CONCLUSION: We did not find any association between ACTN3 R577X gene polymorphism and probable sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia and LMM. Besides, much more research is needed to reveal how ethnicity affects the muscles of older adults with ACTN3 R577X gene polymorphism.

Ishii test for screening sarcopenia: performance in community-dwelling older adults.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is associated with an increased likelihood of major adverse health outcomes. Therefore, screening and early and timely identification of sarcopenia are essential. EWGSOP2 (European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People2) suggests Ishii screening test for formal-case findings. We aimed to define the diagnostic value of the Ishii screening test, which estimates the probability of sarcopenia using an equation-derived score based on three variables (age, grip strength, and calf circumference) in Turkish older adults. METHODS: Older adults aged > = 60 who applied to a geriatric outpatient clinic were included in the study. The recommendation of the EWGSOP2 for the definition of sarcopenia was followed. The probability of sarcopenia was estimated by using a score chart of Ishii. Performance of Ishii screening test was analyzed by using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: We included 1635 patients with the mean age of 74.7 ± 7.0. The prevalence of probable sarcopenia was 11.9%. The prevalence of confirmed sarcopenia according to height2 was 0.7%. The prevalence of severe sarcopenia was 0.3% in total. Against diagnoses of probable sarcopenia, confirmed sarcopenia, and severe sarcopenia, the sensitivity values of the Ishii screening test were 84%, 100%, and 100%; the specificity values were 86.1%, 83.9%, and 84.6%, respectively. PPV values were 44.9%, 4.2%, 2.1%; NPV were 97.6%, 100%, 100%, and the AUC values were 0.933, 0.961, and 0.959, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the Ishii screening test is a successful screening and maybe a candidate diagnostic test for sarcopenia.

Sarcopenia in patients following stroke: an overlooked problem.

Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of sarcopenia in stroke patients, the relationship between sarcopenia detected with different low muscle mass (LMM) adjustment methods, and between stroke-related parameters. Eighty-one patients with chronic stroke who underwent inpatient rehabilitation were included. Spasticity was evaluated by modified Ashworth scale, Brunnstrom staging approach was used for motor function evaluation, physical independence was evaluated using Barthel Index, quality-of-life was evaluated by EQ-5D-3L, and the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale was used to measure multimorbidity. Muscle strength was evaluated by handgrip strength, muscle quantity through a bioelectric impedance analysis, and physical performance by gait speed and short physical performance battery. LMM was calculated through two different methods: Skeletal muscle mass (SMM)/height2, and SMM/BMI. For the definition of sarcopenia, we followed the EWGSOP2 recommendation. Associated sarcopenia factors were predicted by multivariate binary logistic regression analysis. The prevalence of probable sarcopenia was 32.1%. The prevalence of confirmed/sarcopenia when LMM was adjusted for BMI was higher than when adjusted for height2 (16 and 1.2%, respectively). Age was significantly higher in those with probable sarcopenia (P = 0.006). Stroke duration was shorter in those with probable or confirmed sarcopenia (P = 0.004, P < 0.001, respectively). EQ-5D-3L scores were significantly lower in those with confirmed sarcopenia (P = 0.050). The strongest associated factor with confirmed sarcopenia was stroke duration (OR: 0.77; 95% CI, 0.618-0.965). This study suggests that prevalence of sarcopenia after a stroke is significantly high. LMM adjusted for BMI comes in front as the adjustment method for LMM after a stroke.

A novel diagnostic method for myasthenia gravis.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Videonystagmography (VNG) which directly records eye movements using infrared video goggles with mini-cameras, is used to measure nystagmus. Our aim is to explore whether VNG can be used to detect a decrement in the extraocular muscle (EOM) activity of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). METHODS: Thirty-four patients with MG, including 13 with ocular-predominant and 21 with generalized MG, and 23 healthy controls participated. Using VNG we recorded the velocity of the eye movements of the patients as they followed a moving target. We then calculated the gain by dividing the eye movement velocity (degrees/second) by the target velocity (degrees/second). RESULTS: In MG subjects, the mean initial gain (maximum gain) was 1.23 ± 0.31 (range: 0.63-2.15) for the right eye and 1.22 ± 0.37 (range; 0.60-2.28) for the left eye. The mean minimum gain was 0.11 ± 0.12 (0.01-0.58) for the right and 0.14 ± 0.5 (0.02-0.55) for the left. Due to fatigue, the movement gain was reduced by 91.7% in the right eye and 88.2% in the left eye. After reaching minimum velocity, gain remained at a minimum for a mean of 1.08 ± 0.52 (0.3-2.4) s for the right and 1.49 ± 0.85 (0.4-3.6) s for the left, before the velocity increased again. There was no fatigue-induced decrement in healthy subjects. DISCUSSION: Our study documents a decrement in EOM activity recorded by VNG in patients with MG which begins to improve within 1-2 s after reaching minimum velocity, analogous to traditional low-frequency repetitive nerve stimulation testing and its U-shaped pattern. Thus, VNG may be a promising diagnostic test for MG.

Occult hepatitis B infection in Turkish HIV-infected patients: A multicentre, retrospective, cross-sectional study, Schindler study.

OBJECTIVE: Occult hepatitis B infection (OHBI) appears to have a higher prevalence in populations at high risk for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with concomitant liver disease. The aim was to assess the prevalence of OHBI in a sample of human immunodeficiency virus -1 positive and HBV surface antigen-negative (HIV-1+/HBsAg-) Turkish patients. METHODS: Ten centres in Turkey were included in the study. Patients were selected on the basis of a power calculation with a known population size of HIV-positive patients and a reported prevalence of OHBI. Gender, age, occupation, place of residence, treatment and clinical status, and laboratory results, including immunodeficiency panel, antibody tests, hemogram, biochemistry, and coagulation studies were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: The number of HIV-infected patients followed in these centres was 3172 and the sample population numbered 278. All 278 were HBsAg negative. The mean age of the sample was 37.2 ± 13.1 years and 235 (84.5%) were male. All but one patient (99.6%) had been treated with antiretroviral therapy. Of the 278 patients, 169 (60.6%) were positive for Anti-HBs and 125 (44.8%) were positive for Anti-HBc IgG. HIV RNA was detected in 203/278 (73%) of the patients. Four HBV DNA (1.4%) were diagnosed with OHBI. There was no significant difference in hemogram, hemoglobin or bilirubin concentrations in those with OHBI compared with the other patients. CONCLUSION: In a representative sample of HIV+ patients from 10 Turkish centres, the prevalence of OHBI was found to be 1.4%. In HIV positive patients, it is important to identify those with OHBI for optimal clinical management and prognosis.

International Validation of the Turkish Inappropriate Medication Use in the Elderly (TIME) Criteria Set: A Delphi Panel Study.

OBJECTIVE: Explicit screening tools and implicit evaluation methods have been developed to assist healthcare professionals in the management of pharmacotherapy in older adults. As prescribing habits and locally available medications vary considerably between countries, guides tailored to the needs of specific regions may be required. We aimed to report the results of the international Delphi validation study for the Turkish Inappropriate Medication use in the Elderly (TIME) criteria set, which aims to detect inappropriate prescribing in older adults in Eastern Europe. METHODS: The study was conducted between June 2019 and March 2020. Delphi rounds were conducted by the TIME international working group, which included 11 internationally recognized experts in geriatric pharmacotherapy as Delphi panelists. They were asked to indicate to what extent they agreed or disagreed with each TIME criterion, taking into account both the available evidence and their own experience. We used a five-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree) and an online software program (SurveyMonkey®) to grade the level of agreement. Criteria with a median value of 1 or 2 and a 75th centile value of 1 or 2 were accepted, and criteria with a median value > 2 were rejected. Those with a median value of 1 or 2 but a 75th centile value > 2 were retained, to be assessed in the following round. The initial list of Delphi criteria comprised 153 TIME items. RESULTS: After three Delphi rounds, 134 criteria were accepted and seven criteria were rejected, while 12 criteria did not achieve consensus, and so were not included in the final validated set of TIME criteria. CONCLUSION: We developed the internationally validated TIME criteria set based on a Delphi process involving international experts. The validation study suggests that the TIME criteria set can be applied in both central and Eastern European settings. Further studies are needed to assess the utility and benefit of the TIME criteria in reducing inappropriate drug use and improving clinical outcomes.

Hypotension in Nursing Home Residents on Antihypertensive Treatment: Is it Associated with Mortality?

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether low systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) due to antihypertensive medications might be related to mortality among nursing home (NH) residents. DESIGN: Observational, longitudinal. SETTING: Nursing home. PARTICIPANTS: Age ≥60 years, receiving antihypertensive medications. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic characteristics, mobility status, number of chronic diseases and drugs, nutritional status, and antihypertensive medications were noted. At the first visit, we recorded blood pressure (BP) measurements of last 1 year, which were measured regularly at 2-week intervals and considered their mean values. SBP and DBP thresholds were analyzed for mortality by ROC analysis. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine factors related to mortality. RESULTS: The sample included 253 residents with a mean age of 75.7 ± 8.7 years, and 66% were male. Residents were evaluated at a mean follow-up time of 14.3 ± 5.2 months (median: 15) for short-term mortality and 31.6 ± 14.3 months (median: 40) for long-term mortality. The prevalence of low SBP (≤110 mm Hg) and low DBP (≤65 mm Hg) was 34.8% and 15.8%, respectively. In follow-up, the short-term mortality rate was 21.7% (n = 55) and the long-term mortality rate was 42.2% (n = 107). Low SBP (≤110 mm Hg) was related to mortality in short- and long-term follow-ups [short-term follow-up: hazard ratio (HR) 3.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-8.6, P = .01; long-term follow-up: HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.0, P = .02], adjusted for age, mobility status, nutritional state, and total number of diseases and drugs. Low DBP (≤65 mm Hg) was related to mortality in short- and long-term follow-ups [short-term follow-up: HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.2-7.8, P = .02, long-term follow-up: HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5-5.2, P = .001], adjusted for age, mobility status, nutritional state, and total number of diseases and drugs. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Systolic hypotension was found in more than one-third of the NH residents receiving antihypertensive treatment. Low SBP and DBP were significant factors associated with mortality. Particular attention should be paid to prevent low SBP and DBP in NH residents on antihypertensive treatment.

Sarcopenia quality-of-life questionnaire (SarQoL)®: translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation in Turkish.

BACKGROUND: The sarcopenia quality-of-life (SarQoL)® questionnaire is a multidimensional sarcopenia specific tool designed for community dwelling older adults. AIMS: The aim of this study was to translate, to cross-culturally adapt and validate the SarQoL® questionnaire to assess sarcopenia-related quality of life in Turkish older adults. METHODS: The validation process was performed in two sections: the first section constituted the translation with cross-cultural adaptation of SarQoL® into Turkish. Second section constituted the clinical validation study. To validate the Turkish version of the SarQoL®, we assessed its validity (discriminative power, construct validity), reliability (internal consistency, test-retest reliability) and floor/ceiling effects. RESULTS: One hundred community-dwelling subjects (mean age: 74.7 ± 6.1 years) were evaluated. The EWGSOP2 consensus diagnostic criteria were used to diagnose probable sarcopenia. A database including 1437 older adults, with complete evaluation of sarcopenia parameters, served to define low global muscle function. Results revealed a good discriminative power: subjects with probable sarcopenia had higher total scores compared to non-sarcopenic subjects (50 ± 16 vs. 68.9 ± 16.9, p < 0.001) a high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.88), consistent construct validity and excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.94-0.98). There was no floor/ceiling effect. CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of the SaQoL® questionnaire was found to be reliable and valid for the measurement of quality of life of sarcopenic patients and is, therefore, available for use in clinical research and practice. This validation could enable use of the SarQoL® tool in the eastern populations more confidently.